9.5 C
New York
Saturday, November 23, 2024
Advertisement

Private Property (4K Restoration) (TheaterByte Movie Review)

private-property-posterWriter/director Leslie Stevens is best known as the creator of the 1960s sci-fi anthology series The Outer Limits, but in 1960 he directed this long-forgotten forgotten crime/drama noir Private Property. Starring Warren Oates in a breakout role that would help define the next couple of decades of his realist performances in the coming New American Cinema, and Leslie’s then wife Kate Manx in a role of seething sexuality as a neglected housewife. In a twist of sad irony, Manx would die only a few years later from suicide.

Perhaps it is easy to fall into the trap of looking at Private Property through modern eyes. On the surface the film seems quite subversive, with an undercurrent of repressed early 1960s sexuality and homoerotic nuance between the two male protagonists. Two violent drifters, Duke (Corey Allen) and Boots private-property-still(Warren Oates), having just robbed a gas station, wander into the idyllic suburbs of Beverly Hills, where the two setup in an empty house across from a well-to-do married couple. Duke, after chastising Boots for never having had sexual relations with a woman, promises to seduce a woman and hand her over to Boots. Duke sets his sights on the flashy, sports-car driving blonde Ann Carlyle (Manx), who we quickly learn is quite neglected by her businessman husband who can barely muster up a “wife noises” to his associate while he’s on the phone as Ann lays out on the couch in an obviously amorous mood proclaiming she’s “ready to go to bed.” Duke is a charmer and when he shows up at Ann’s house claiming to be a gardener, she’s quickly ensnared by his seduction. Tension slowly mounts between Duke and Boots as Boots becomes convinced that Duke is going to keep Ann for himself and not “give” Ann to him.

private-property-still-2The sexual dysfunction in Boots and Duke is perhaps the most obvious trap of modern thinking. Is it there, or is it a modern construct for us to infer some deeper meaning in Stevens’ work? As Duke sets up what we finally see is going to be a rape of Ann by Boots, something in itself a quite shocking topic for the era, there is obvious psychosexual tension at play between the two, especially when we see the final outcome of this slow-burning scenario.

The overall arc, however, could be even larger than this. Maybe it is an outright rejection of 1950s mores entirely. Remember, this is 1960; pretty much still tied to 1950s ideals. Ann is very much a 1950s housewife, at least as portrayed by the media. Her dissatisfaction is palpable and the destruction of the entire structure is the ultimate result of that dissatisfaction.

One thing is certain; Stevens coaxed magnificent performances out of the entire cast in this one, even given its almost bizarre theme. The mood is enhanced by the photography of Ted McCord who brings a stark, shadowy black and white film noir style to Leslie’s slow build up of tension that leads to an amazingly violent (for 1960) and chaotic climax in the final act.

Private Property was restored by Cinelicious in 4K resolution on Cinelicious’ own Scanity film scanner from the private-property-still-3earliest known existing element, a 35mm dupe negative that was recently discovered and preserved by the UCLA Film & Television Archive. The scan was then digitally restored frame-by-frame using a variety of tools to remove dirt, scratches, flicker and other damage. While the full aperture elements were completely restored, the film is presented in its original theatrical aspect ratio of 1.37:1.

I was invited to a screening of this new 4K restoration at Lincoln Center’s Elinor Bunin Munroe Film Center in New York City. The new 4K restoration looks breathtaking; like the film has hardly aged. One imagines it looks almost as good as the day it first ran in theaters, with a beautiful, natural level of grain and wonderful black and white contrast.

The newly restored Private Property opens July 1 at The Film Society of Lincoln Center anchoring a Warren Oates Retrospective. It will also be available this summer on various VOD platforms and on Blu-ray and DVD courtesy of Cinelicious Pics.


Private Property (4K Restoration) (TheaterByte Movie Review)
4 / 5 TheaterByte Rating
{{ reviewsOverall }} / 5 Users (0 votes)
Citation Films Inc. | Cinelicious PicsStudios & Distributors
USACountry
EnglishLanguage
79 Mins.Run Time
1.37:1Aspect Ratio
Leslie StevensDirector
Leslie StevensWriter
24 Apil 1960Release Date
The Film
Summary
Private Property is a provocative slow-burner with powerful performances that, viewed through modern eyes, is a subversive psychosexual drama deserving of rediscovery.
What people say... Login to rate
Order by:

Be the first to leave a review.

User Avatar User Avatar
Verified
{{{ review.rating_title }}}
{{{review.rating_comment | nl2br}}}

This review has no replies yet.

Avatar
Show more
Show more
{{ pageNumber+1 }}
Advertisement

Related Articles

Join the Discussion on TheaterByte!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Stay Connected

301FansLike
0FollowersFollow
184FollowersFollow
1,710FollowersFollow
- Advertisement -

Notice of Compliance with FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 255

In accordance with the Federal Trade Commission 16 CFR part 255 guidelines, this website hereby states that it receives free discs and other theatrical or home entertainment "screeners" and access to screening links from studios and/or PR firms, and is provided with consumer electronics devices on loan from hardware manufacturers and/or PR firms respectively for the purposes of evaluating the products and its content for editorial reviews. We receive no compensation from these companies for our opinions or for the writing of reviews or editorials.
Permission is sometimes granted to companies to quote our work and editorial reviews free of charge. Our website may contain affiliate marketing links, which means we may get paid commission on sales of those products or the services we write about. Our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers or affiliate partnerships. This disclosure is provided in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR § 255.5: Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.

Latest Articles