4 C
New York
Thursday, November 21, 2024
Advertisement

Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (1961) Blu-ray Review

voyage-to-the-bottom-of-the-sea-blu-ray-coverU.S. Release

– (scroll to bottom if using mobile os)

The Film

[Rating:3.5/5]

titler

Summer films are aimed at the young and restless who frequented the movie theaters and drive-ins of their respective eras. Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea captured the national excitement of the nuclear submarine program. While the special effects departments of most Hollywood studios were in their infancy, this film goes to the limit of what was then available. The submarine Seaview is undergoing some trial dives. The sub’s designer Admiral Harriman Nelson (Walter Pidgeon) and the commanding officer of the Seaview, Captain Lee Crane (Robert Sterling) accommodate a psychologist Dr. Susan Hiller (Joan Fontaine) and scientist Commodore Lucius Emery (Peter Lorre). There is a background love story between Crane and the only other woman on board, Lt. Cathy Connors (Barbara Eden). The teen appeal factor is provided by pop singer Frankie Avalon (Lt.jg Frankie Romano).

sub

A global warning crisis is in effect caused by the van Allen belt (sound familiar?) and the Seaview crew must come up with a salvation plan that involves firing a nuclear missle at the burning belt when they reach the Marianas.  Along the way, they rescue the hyper-religious scientist (Michael Ansara) from Ice Floe Delta.  While the submarine remains underwater and cut off from surface communication, tensions mount among the crew.  The monotony of life in cramped quarters is broken by a series of hazards including an attack on the divers by a giant squid and the sub’s inadvertent entry into a huge minefield. Further problems surface as the crew becomes increasingly restless, resulting in apparent sabotage and possible mutiny.

barb

As apocalyptic pictures go, there is enough tension to keep viewers engaged to what, for some, might be a foregone (and most welcome) conclusion that surmounts a rather hokey script.

Video Quality

[Rating:3.5/5]

squid

Special effects are essential to the credibility of this submarine adventure and, given what studios had 50 years ago, these are mostly well conveyed. Okay, the giant squid is a bit of schlock but there are far more hits than misses. Close-ups are pretty crisp (some etching is evident) and the colors are beautiful. While no amount of remastering will make Voyage look like a 2013 release, the studio magicians certainly are to be commended for the final product.

Audio Quality

[Rating:3.5/5]

frankie

The DTS-HD Master Audio 4.0 soundtrack is reasonably free of boxiness and distortion in the louder passages. The atmospheric score by Paul Sawtell and Bert Shelter receives its due.

Supplemental Materials

[Rating:3/5]

slide rule

  • Commentary by author Tim Colliver
  • Science Fiction Fantasy to Reality Documentary: 16:50 (English Dolby Digital Stereo 48kHz/16-bit). A mini-feature on the impact of science fiction on popular culture that is intelligent and informative.
  • Interview with Barbara Eden: 5:57 (English Dolby Digital Stereo 48kHz1/16-bit). A fond remembrance of director Allen and this film by one of its stars
  • Isolated Score Track
  • Original Theatrical Trailer: 3:12 (English Dolby Digital Stereo 48kHz/16-bit)

The Definitive Word

Overall:

[Rating:3.5/5]

nyc

The summer season often brings out the best in the science fiction/fantasy adventure film world, and Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea certainly scores on that front. Director/Producer Irwin Allen eventually parlayed this film into a very popular TV series. Overlooking a raft of rather trite dialogue and some formulaic plot twists, this remains, a half century later, an entertaining movie that will appeal to all audiences.

Additional Screen Captures

[amazon-product]B00E9ZAU02[/amazon-product]

cigars

infirm

mines

engine

sub2

[amazon-product]B00E9ZAU02[/amazon-product]

Advertisement

Related Articles

2 COMMENTS

  1. An interesting review of the Blu-ray disk. The reviewer may film of that period and budget might look a bit quaint and unconvincing compared to today’s quarter of a billion dollar CGI fests and that’s a legitimate critcism. However when he wrote “While the special effects departments of most Hollywood studios were in their infancy … ” he is simply ignorant. Seriously? From the mid teens on they had very large, skilled effects departments. Check out the website http://nzpetesmatteshot.blogspot.com/ just to see what they did with matte paintings alone. Most of the effects shots the reviewer could not pick out as effects shots.

    • Outside of Mr. Gill’s poor syntax at the beginning of his post, the point that I tried to make (and I think was missed) was in reference to the modern era of special effects to which we have become accustomed in today’s films. So-called special effects have been in films since D.W. Griffith’s era but up to the 1950s, they were relatively primitive. In the spirit of forgiveness, I will choose to ignore the ad hominem criticism that this reviewer is “simply ignorant.”

Join the Discussion on TheaterByte!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Stay Connected

301FansLike
0FollowersFollow
184FollowersFollow
1,710FollowersFollow
- Advertisement -

Notice of Compliance with FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION 16 CFR Part 255

In accordance with the Federal Trade Commission 16 CFR part 255 guidelines, this website hereby states that it receives free discs and other theatrical or home entertainment "screeners" and access to screening links from studios and/or PR firms, and is provided with consumer electronics devices on loan from hardware manufacturers and/or PR firms respectively for the purposes of evaluating the products and its content for editorial reviews. We receive no compensation from these companies for our opinions or for the writing of reviews or editorials.
Permission is sometimes granted to companies to quote our work and editorial reviews free of charge. Our website may contain affiliate marketing links, which means we may get paid commission on sales of those products or the services we write about. Our editorial content is not influenced by advertisers or affiliate partnerships. This disclosure is provided in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR § 255.5: Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.

Latest Articles